Pick and Choose

9 09 2009

Tonight is President Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress (source: Real Clear Politics). The President already has a leg up in that setting—as soon as everyone notices how few of the seats in a joint session are occupied by Republicans. The Democrats have such large majorities that a significant number of them have to sit on the other side of the aisle. Literally. So is there really any reason to even address the Republican half of the room? (Did I say “half”? It’s actually closer to 40 percent.) They should just position the President’s podium to face the Democrats’ 60 percent. After all, if every Democrat were on board we wouldn’t need any Republican votes. I just hope the Republicans don’t try to stand up and yell things during the speech like their town hall thugs. Hey, if you can shout down a woman in a wheelchair, how much of a stretch is it to shout down the President of the United States?

We may be close to getting some kind of healthcare reform passed. You can tell, because conservatives are busy making plans for how to get around it. Their latest obsession is invoking their own bizarre interpretation of the 10th Amendment (source: The American Prospect). Conservatives are saying they’re rallying around the “true Constitution” by trying to use the 10th Amendment to nullify the rest of the Constitution! Conservatives want to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution they pay attention to, just like they pick and choose which parts of the Bible they heed. “Homosexuality is bad! Help the poor? Heal the sick? Who said that crap?” The 10th Amendment says “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Interpreted by Republicans, that means “We don’t have to obey any laws we disagree with.” Tenthers use their flimsy argument to say that Medicare, Social Security, and federal minimum wage laws are all illegal. Basically, they believe in states’ rights at the expense of human rights.

These tenther nuts would make the birther loonies look rational… if they weren’t all the same people. Put tenther philosophy together with birther beliefs and you come up with “Barack Obama isn’t really President. And even if he is, we don’t have to listen to him.” Well, tonight they’re going to have to listen to him… unless Congressional Republicans choose to stick their fingers in their ears and chant “La la la la la la, this isn’t happening!”


Actions

Information

2 responses

21 09 2009
dennis

the former President Carter is right on the money!
the fact that the republicans have devoted so much attention to this issue is proff of guilt: ( a portion of the 09/12/2009 protesters werre there for racial reasons)
now the repulicans who say they are not raciest claim Obama is starting martial law and death camps?
the comment are designed to start a racial war in the USA:
none of the drug companies are from the USA nor is the bulk of the insurance companies or I have no proff that they are Owned by all US citizens and what about fox news its owned by an Austrialian ; whos side are they on the russians or the North Koreans :

9 09 2009
Debbie Heinzmann

Randi, what if your employer offers you coverage, but it’s crappy…my problem is that I do have health insurance, but I have been denied coverage for mental health services, or told that a provider who is really helping my daughter is “out of network”, or I’m constantly asked to fill out forms on whether the reason my child went to the doctor was an injury that would be covered by another insurance, blah, blah blah. Of course it is better than if I didn’t have any insurance at all.

I would like to have health coverage that is not bound by “networks” or even my employment. If my employer decides, for example, to change insurance companies, then I have to change all my family’s doctors, etc.

I am worried that this bill will end up like “No Child Left Behind”, which is an awful bill in many important respects; like the unrealistic expectations of 100% of children reaching an artificially mandated level of profienciency, and the punitive measures if these aritificial benchmarks are not met…a school can improve a a sizeable amount, but if it is not as “high” as it should have been, the school can be taken over by the state!

I do not have much faith right now in health care reform; hopefully President Obama can change my mind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: